THE EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

This article provides general features of the legislation common law countries (Great Britain and United States) as well civil countries, in regulating issue admissibility evidence, specifies definition their properties, also describes detail categories inadmissible evidence with a simultaneous comparison requirements Republic Uzbekistan. Besides, an analysis criteria for inadmissibility these was carried out, comparative aspects disclosure values, interpretation applying named government, national legislation, including those recent innovations established to criminal procedure legislation. Moreover, positive negative field each system law, legal scholars` points view regarding this issue. The substantiates existence objective logical connection between establishment high admission achievement truth case, which is characterized inversely proportional. In conclusion article, author’s understanding meaning formulated, formulation relationship goals process implementation rights participants.